On 22-10-2025, a Division Bench of the Lahore High Court appointed Ch. Imran Hassan Ali as amicus curiae in a case related to the Contract Act, 1872, the Specific Relief Act, 1877, and the Qanun-e-Shahadat Order, 1984. The Court seeks assistance on whether an oral contract for the sale of immovable property can be considered valid and enforceable in the absence of a written agreement, and what evidential standards apply to establish such an oral agreement. Additionally, the case involves the question of under what circumstances a court may order the purchaser in such an agreement to deposit the outstanding sale consideration in court, and what legal consequences would follow if the purchaser fails to make the required deposit.
It is a great honour for Imran. All praise is for Allah alone!
Watch this space for further updates on this case.
The building of a famous hotel chain in Murree is the subject of a contractual dispute between partners in a joint venture business agreement (“JV”). One party (“the claimant”), who is the sleeping partner, sought damages as well as cancellation and rescission of the JV alleging certain breaches of the agreement. The second party, who is actively managing the property/business, denied the claim. The matter went to arbitration. The arbitrator, a former High Court judge, gave an award in favour of the claimant, declaring the agreement null and void, and directing the second party to give up possession of the building. The award was made rule of the court by the Civil Judge who dismissed the second party’s objections. The second party’s appeal to the High Court was also unsuccessful.
Ch. Imran Hassan Ali was instructed by the second party for a petition seeking leave to appeal to the Supreme Court of Pakistan. On 06-07-2023, after hearing Imran in support of the petition, the Supreme Court granted ex parte ad interim injunction protecting possession of the second party. The case was heard again on 10-08-2023 in the presence of counsel for the other side by a bench headed by the Honourable Chief Justice Umer Ata Bandial, and the interim injunction in respect of possession was extended till further orders.
The case raises some interesting questions of contract law.